I think it would encourage more custom component creation if there was an easier way to get all the boilerplate in place. I felt this could be a nice addition while I was working with ng-cli.
Something along these lines would be awesome, What are your thoughts?
As a workaround, we talked about providing cookiecutters for the generate part, then I guess have a Makefile/Invoke in the template run the commands build and run pointing to the package.json location. Not branded streamlit but would work decently enough.
Yes I think cookiecutter should do it. Atleast for the generate part. I like the idea of makefile as well. Will try to whip up something on the same lines.
I’d love to see such commands directly embedded in streamlit as well!
Makefiles are great, I overly use them (already have one to build yarn + bdist_wheel, and launch twine). However, although you can use them almost out of the box on Linux, on Windows you’d need an additional installation step.
Frankly I’ve never been able to run Makefiles correctly on Windows (sad because Streamlit dev setup is mostly Makefile too…), which is why I’m more used to Invoke
+1 for the point about Makefiles on windows.
I was just wondering if we had this CLI functionality will it encourage more custom development in this sense,
Like suppose I start a streamlit project and needed to simply use geolocation api of html5, if I had this option maybe I could setup my project like this,
myproject->
|- components
| |- geolocation_component
|- main.py <- import geolocation component and use it here
I know its pretty vague, but if I could do something like this it would drastically change the extent of usage of streamlit for me.
Maybe this approach would make my project more of a react project than a python project but the flexibility to do this quick-plugin-in based development would be pretty handy for some usecases.